<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
  <channel>
    <title>大语言模型 on Meshs One Blog</title>
    <link>https://blog.meshs.one/tags/%E5%A4%A7%E8%AF%AD%E8%A8%80%E6%A8%A1%E5%9E%8B/</link>
    <description>Recent content in 大语言模型 on Meshs One Blog</description>
    <generator>Hugo</generator>
    <language>en</language>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Jul 2026 08:00:00 +0800</lastBuildDate>
    <atom:link href="https://blog.meshs.one/tags/%E5%A4%A7%E8%AF%AD%E8%A8%80%E6%A8%A1%E5%9E%8B/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
    <item>
      <title>We need to translate the given English text into Chinese (Simplified) following the specified localization style. The source text is: &#34;Prompt Caching &#43; Smart Routing: The Developer&#39;s Guide to Cutting 70% of Your LLM Bill&#34; We must output ONLY the translation, nothing else. The style guide says: use Chinese tech industry standard terminology, keep company names as is but add Chinese on first mention (but here no company names), numbers use Chinese comma format (70% is fine), punctuation Chinese full-width. Tone professional developer-to-developer. Translation: &#34;提示缓存 &#43; 智能路由：开发者削减 70% LLM 账单指南&#34; Check: &#34;Prompt Caching&#34; -&gt; &#34;提示缓存&#34; (common term), &#34;Smart Routing&#34; -&gt; &#34;智能路由&#34;, &#34;Developer&#39;s Guide&#34; -&gt; &#34;开发者指南&#34;, &#34;Cutting 70% of Your LLM Bill&#34; -&gt; &#34;削减 70% LLM 账单&#34;. Use Chinese full-width colon and plus sign? The source has a colon and plus sign. In Chinese, we use full-width colon ：and full-width plus ＋? Actually the style says punctuation Chinese full-width, so colon should be ：, plus sign should be ＋? But typical tech blogs might keep plus as half-width? The guide says &#34;Punctuation: Chinese full-width （）「」——；：,.? use Chinese full-width&#34;. It doesn&#39;t explicitly mention plus sign, but likely also full-width. However, common practice in Chinese tech writing often uses half-width for symbols like &#43; and : to match code style. But the guide says &#34;Chinese full-width&#34; for punctuation. Let&#39;s see: they list parentheses, brackets, dashes, semicolon, colon, comma, period, question mark. Plus sign is not punctuation but operator. I think it&#39;s safer to use half-width for &#43; and :? Actually the source has a colon and plus. Many Chinese tech articles use half-width colon and plus. But the guide explicitly says &#34;colon: use Chinese full-width&#34;. So colon should be full-width ：. For plus, it&#39;s not listed, but to be consistent with full-width style, maybe use ＋? However, that might look odd. I&#39;ll check typical 机器之心 style: they often use half-width symbols in titles. But the guide says &#34;Punctuation: Chinese full-width&#34;. I&#39;ll follow the guide strictly: colon full-width, plus sign? I&#39;ll use half-width &#43; because it&#39;s</title>
      <link>https://blog.meshs.one/zh/posts/prompt-caching-smart-routing-developer-guide/</link>
      <pubDate>Tue, 07 Jul 2026 08:00:00 +0800</pubDate>
      <guid>https://blog.meshs.one/zh/posts/prompt-caching-smart-routing-developer-guide/</guid>
      <description>提示缓存与模型路由如何协同工作，实现70%以上的成本节省——包含真实数据、配置示例以及可立即实施的置信度阈值策略。</description>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
